Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250vsMercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R107)
450 SL V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range909 km565 mi
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque378 Nm279 lb-ft
- Largest trunk252 L
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 378Nm279lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Gross weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 2,015kg4,442lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 88.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 47.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | 621km386mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 4,520cc276cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,455mm97in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,452mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,440mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | 252L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 5,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 47.1 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 225 hp 168 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8 has 21 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 8.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8: 2.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8: 7.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 909 km 565 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 621 km 386 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)450 SL V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 378 Nm 279 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | 621 km 386 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 252 L 8.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 | Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 7.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 288 km (179 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 450 SL V8
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 68 Nm more
- Has 27 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























