Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) · Facelift 2002
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) · Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8vsMercedes-Benz S-class (W221) · Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S-class (W221) · Facelift 2009
S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lightest1,910 kg4,211 lb
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score83/100
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.4 L/100 km17.6 mpg US21.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
- Best estimated range865 km537 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 435hp324kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,935kg4,266lb |
| Gross weight | 2,480kg5,467lb | 2,615kg5,765lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 44.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 47.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.7L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton Calculated | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 865km537mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 4,663cc285cu in |
| Length | 5,043mm199in | 5,096mm201in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,444mm57in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,965mm117in | 3,035mm119in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 560L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 317g/km | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 2,750-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 5,250 rpm | 1,800-3,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 14.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 435 hp 324 kW |
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8 has 65 hp more than Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8: 65 hp (48 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 4.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 667 km 414 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 865 km 537 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 435 hp 324 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 |
| 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W220)Facelift 2002AMG S 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W221)Facelift 2009S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 435 hp 324 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | 1,935 kg 4,266 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 865 km 537 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 317 g/km | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8 | Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km | 16.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year | 2,520 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W220) Facelift 2002 AMG S 55 V8
- Has 65 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W221) Facelift 2009 S 500 BlueEFFICIENCY
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 198 km (123 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
- Emits 93 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























