Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) · Facelift 2017 AMG S 65vsMercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) · Facelift 2017 AMG S 63
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) · Facelift 2017
AMG S 63
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Best estimated range792 km492 mi
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score80/100
Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful630 hp470 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Lightest2,110 kg4,652 lb
- Best power-to-weight299 hp/t223 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630hp470kW | 612hp456kW |
| Torque | 1,000Nm738lb-ft | 900Nm664lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Gross weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | 2,635kg5,809lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 43.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 299hp/t223kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton Calculated | 427Nm/t285lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 672km418mi Calculated | 792km492mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,980cc365cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 5,051mm199in | 5,051mm199in |
| Wheelbase | 2,945mm116in | 2,945mm116in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 279g/km | 229g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 4,800-5,400 rpm | 2,300-4,300 rpm | 5,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 2,750-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 12.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 118 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 630 hp 470 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 612 hp 456 kW |
Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 has 18 hp more than Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63 and Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 4.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 3.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 has more power, Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63 and Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63 and Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 672 km 418 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 792 km 492 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 630 hp 470 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 612 hp 456 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017AMG S 65 | Mercedes-BenzS-class Cabriolet (A217)Facelift 2017AMG S 63 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp 470 kW | 612 hp 456 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | 900 Nm 664 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | 2,110 kg 4,652 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 672 km 418 mi | 792 km 492 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 279 g/km | 229 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65 | Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz S-class Coupe (C217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 65
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz S-class Cabriolet (A217) Facelift 2017 AMG S 63
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 120 km (74 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 50 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























