Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCYvsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 3.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
3.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lightest1,940 kg4,277 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range792 km492 mi
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 304hp227kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Gross weight | 2,950kg6,504lb | 2,410kg5,313lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated | 227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 792km492mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 2,953cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,922mm194in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,922mm76in | 1,876mm74in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,661mm65in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,950L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 248g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 5,600 rpm | 2,100-4,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 306 hp 228 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 304 hp 227 kW |
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY has 2 hp more than Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 1,940 kg 4,277 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 6.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY has more power, Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 792 km 492 mi |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 306 hp 228 kW | 7.8 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 304 hp 227 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 304 hp 227 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,150 kg 4,740 lb | 1,940 kg 4,277 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 792 km 492 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 248 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.68 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,651 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 V6 BlueEFFICIENCY
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 3.0 T6
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























