Volvo V70 III
Car comparison
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5vsMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010
R 350 CDI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,567 kg3,455 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions189 g/km
- Largest trunk575 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Best estimated range941 km585 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,567kg3,455lb | 2,175kg4,795lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,880kg6,349lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 87.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 864km537mi Calculated | 941km585mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,823mm190in | 4,922mm194in |
| Width | - | 1,922mm76in |
| Height | 1,547mm61in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,816mm111in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,661mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 151mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 575L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,950L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 189g/km | 223g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,980 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 has 25 hp more than Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 and Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 864 km 537 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 941 km 585 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.7 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 III2.0 T5 | Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | 2,175 kg 4,795 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 864 km 537 mi | 941 km 585 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 189 g/km | 223 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5 | Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.17 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,126 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 III 2.0 T5
- Is 608 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
- Emits 34 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























