Porsche Macan I (95B)
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X166)
GLS 350d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions172 g/km
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,316 km818 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 104.5s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 43.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 878km546mi Calculated | 1,316km818mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,934mm76in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,850mm73in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 185mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | 172g/km | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 3,400 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 3,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 43.5 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 258 hp 192 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d has 6 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 7.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d has more power, Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 878 km 546 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 1,316 km 818 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.7 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 258 hp 192 kW | 7.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 878 km 546 mi | 1,316 km 818 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 172 g/km | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Is 610 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 27 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 350d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Has 437 km (272 mi) more estimated range
- Has 180 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























