Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) · Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6vsNissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010
3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range930 km578 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
- Lightest1,830 kg4,034 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 256hp191kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 334Nm246lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,297kg5,064lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.0s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 90.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | 774km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,987cc182cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,536mm179in | 4,860mm191in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,885mm74in |
| Height | 1,669mm66in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,825mm111in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,597mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 188mm7in | 178mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 248g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 256 hp 191 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 has 9 hp more than Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 6.4 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 3.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 930 km 578 mi |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 774 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 256 hp 191 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLK (X204)Facelift 2012GLK 350 CDI V6 | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 256 hp 191 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | 774 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 248 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6 | Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLK (X204) Facelift 2012 GLK 350 CDI V6
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 286 Nm more
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 156 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 48 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
- Is 20 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























