Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 200vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)
GLC 250d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score92/100
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 200
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Largest trunk545 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,520kg5,556lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 115.6s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 101.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.6s Calculated | 42.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 165Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km482mi Calculated | 926km575mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,769mm188in | 4,732mm186in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | 1,606mm63in | 1,602mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 2,873mm113in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,620mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,619mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 158mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 545L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,490L | 1,400L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 143g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.6 s | 42.3 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 89 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 200: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 200: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 775 km 482 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 926 km 575 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.9 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)GLC 200 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)GLC 250d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,945 kg 4,288 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 482 mi | 926 km 575 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 143 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 545 L 19.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 200 | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C254) GLC 200
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) GLC 250d
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 151 km (94 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























