Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6vsMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) · Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) · Facelift 2019
AMG GLC 43 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions178 g/km
- Best estimated range897 km558 mi
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 390hp291kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 2,430kg5,357lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 64.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 74.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.5s Calculated | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t180kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 217hp/t162kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 342Nm/t229lb-ft/ton Calculated | 289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 897km558mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | - | 4,749mm187in |
| Width | - | 1,890mm74in |
| Height | - | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,873mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,639mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,617mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 168mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | 1,400L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | 240g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | - | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.5 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 390 hp 291 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6 has 23 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 4.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 897 km 558 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016AMG SLC 43 V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 43 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 897 km 558 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | 240 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 217 hp/t 162 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6 | Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 AMG SLC 43 V6
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 269 km (167 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 62 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) Facelift 2019 AMG GLC 43 V6
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 275 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























