Skoda Kodiaq II
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 220
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
GLB 220
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Largest trunk845 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,974kg4,352lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.7s Calculated | 43.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 879km546mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,758mm187in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,656mm65in | 1,697mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 187mm7in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 845L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,035L | 1,800L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.7 s | 43.1 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 1,974 kg 4,352 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 7.9 s |
Although Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 879 km 546 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,974 kg 4,352 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 879 km 546 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 845 L 29.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 165 km (102 mi) more estimated range
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220
- Is 284 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























