Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220dvsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,753kg3,865lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.9s Calculated | 47.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 845km525mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,417mm174in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 3,600-3,800 rpm | 1,400-3,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 3,940-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,940 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.9 s | 47.0 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has 3 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
Although Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 845 km 525 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,753 kg 3,865 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 845 km 525 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 293 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 291 km (181 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 194 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























