Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 220dvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.3s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 78.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.9s Calculated | 37.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,063km660mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,424mm174in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 125g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 3,600-3,800 rpm | 1,400-3,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.9 s | 37.1 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 7.7 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.7 s |
Although Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,063 km 660 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,063 km 660 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 125 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























