Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 220vsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk421 L
- Best practicality score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,480kg3,263lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.0s Calculated | 36.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 848km527mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,424mm174in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,593mm102in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.0 s | 36.1 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220 and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 7.2 s |
Although Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220 and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 848 km 527 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,480 kg 3,263 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 848 km 527 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220 | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























