Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 200vsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017

GLA 200

184 hp1991 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2017-2019
VS

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
184hp137kW
190hp142kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,450kg3,197lb
1,535kg3,384lb
Gross weight
1,940kg4,277lb
2,130kg4,696lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
77.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
76.3s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
33.7s
Calculated
37.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton
Calculated
261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,000km621mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,424mm174in
4,299mm169in
Width
1,804mm71in
1,822mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,557mm61in
Wheelbase
2,699mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track-
1,563mm62in
Rear track-
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance-
165mm6in
Trunk volume
421L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,235L
1,390L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank-
51L
CO2 emissions-
133g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200: Power / Torque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 2005,500 rpm1,200-1,400 rpm5,750 rpm
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.7 s
37.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
150 km/h
93 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
184 hp
137 kW
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,535 kg
3,384 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
225 km/h
140 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
184 hp
137 kW
7.6 s
225 km/h
140 mph
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
184 hp
137 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
Fuel consumption
-
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Range score
-
1,000 km
621 mi
CO2 score
-
133 g/km
Trunk score
421 L
14.9 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
127 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200

  • Is 85 kg lighter
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 200
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 200 vs Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster