Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 200vsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 2,130kg4,696lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.7s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,424mm174in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-1,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.7 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200 and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 7.6 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 200 | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 200
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























