Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250evsVolkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Cross
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful160 hp119 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.8 L/100 km130.7 mpg US156.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,944 km1,208 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score100/100
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,249 kg2,754 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,249kg2,754lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 47.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 1.8L/100 km130.7mpg US156.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 147Nm/t98lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,944km1,208mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,235mm167in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,760mm69in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,551mm100in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 385L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,385L | 1,281L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 35L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 5,500 rpm | 1,620 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 47.7 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 160 hp 119 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e has 10 hp more than Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 1,249 kg 2,754 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e and Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e and Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1,944 km 1,208 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e |
| 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,249 kg 2,754 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,944 km 1,208 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e | Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 1.8 L/100 km130.7 mpg US156.9 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 3.15 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 5.07 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 270 L71 US gal59 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 472.50 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,175 km (730 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Is 451 kg lighter
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























