Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220dvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
GLA 250e
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,460 kg3,219 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk421 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score80/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.8 L/100 km130.7 mpg US156.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,944 km1,208 mi
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 77.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.9s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 1.8L/100 km130.7mpg US156.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 147Nm/t98lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,136km706mi Calculated | 1,944km1,208mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,417mm174in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,611mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 385L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 1,385L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 35L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 3,600-3,800 rpm | 1,400-3,400 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 5,500 rpm | 1,620 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.9 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 160 hp 119 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d has 17 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 7.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 1,136 km 706 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1,944 km 1,208 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.7 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 160 hp 119 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e |
| 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250e | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 1.8 L/100 km 130.7 mpg US 156.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,136 km 706 mi | 1,944 km 1,208 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 1.8 L/100 km130.7 mpg US156.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 3.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 5.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 270 L71 US gal59 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 472.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250e
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 808 km (502 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























