Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250vsMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (X156)
GLA 250
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range848 km527 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 29.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 718km446mi Calculated | 848km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,417mm174in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,699mm106in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 421L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,430L | 1,425L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 56L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 5,800 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 29.3 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 718 km 446 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 848 km 527 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 250 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 718 km 446 mi | 848 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 250
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























