Skoda Kodiaq II
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range823 km511 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Largest trunk910 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,889kg4,165lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,390kg5,269lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.0s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 79.4s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.8s Calculated | 37.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 725km450mi Calculated | 823km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,758mm187in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,657mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 187mm7in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 910L | 427L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,105L | 1,422L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.8 s | 37.9 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 1,889 kg 4,165 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 725 km 450 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 823 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,889 kg 4,165 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 725 km 450 mi | 823 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 910 L 32.1 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 483 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 239 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 98 km (61 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























