Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200dvsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range982 km610 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score92/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Largest trunk427 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,585kg3,494lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.8s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 77.0s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 58.9s Calculated | 90.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km461mi Calculated | 982km610mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,582mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,594mm102in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,547mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,552mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 392L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,422L | 1,237L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 58.9 s | 90.5 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 741 km 461 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 982 km 610 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,585 kg 3,494 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 461 mi | 982 km 610 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 392 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 2.0 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 99 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 241 km (150 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























