Skoda Karoq · Facelift 2021
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq · Facelift 2021 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight91 hp/t68 kW/t10.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,652kg3,642lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Gross weight | 2,034kg4,484lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.2s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 90.5s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 59.1s Calculated | 70.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 926km575mi Calculated | 823km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,390mm173in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,629mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,638mm104in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 169mm7in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 521L | 427L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,630L | 1,422L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 59.1 s | 70.0 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 137 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 1,652 kg 3,642 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 926 km 575 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 823 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.1 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,652 kg 3,642 lb | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 926 km 575 mi | 823 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 10.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Has 94 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200d
- Is 12 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























