Volkswagen T-Roc I
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCRvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,378 kg3,038 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,064 km661 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,378kg3,038lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 2,190kg4,828lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 84.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 62.2s Calculated | 66.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,064km661mi Calculated | 981km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,573mm62in | 1,611mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 62.2 s | 66.0 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 1,064 km 661 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 981 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI SCR | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,064 km 661 mi | 981 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TDI SCR
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 217 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























