Volkswagen T-Cross
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSIvsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
GLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,249 kg2,754 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range896 km557 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,249kg2,754lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 2,135kg4,707lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 47.7s Calculated | 55.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 896km557mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,235mm167in | 4,410mm174in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,584mm62in | 1,611mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,551mm100in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,281L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 43L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 3,400-4,440 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,690 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 47.7 s | 55.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 1,249 kg 2,754 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 8.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 896 km 557 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,249 kg 2,754 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 896 km 557 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Cross 1.5 TSI
- Is 291 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 200d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























