Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5vsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
GLA 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range871 km541 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 2,095kg4,619lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.5s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.8s Calculated | 54.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 155Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 871km541mi Calculated | 589km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,412mm174in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 43L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 4,700-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.8 s | 54.4 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 has 7 hp more than Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 8.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 has more power, Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 871 km 541 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 589 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 871 km 541 mi | 589 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) C 1.5
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 282 km (175 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























