Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) · Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0vsMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
AMG GLA 35
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
- Best power-to-weight191 hp/t142 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,605kg3,538lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 62.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 191hp/t142kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 183hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 280Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | 554km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,297mm169in | 4,436mm175in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,615mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,563mm62in | 1,593mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 435L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,430L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 176 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 306 hp 228 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 5.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 5.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 729 km 453 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 554 km 344 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023AMG GLA 35 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | 554 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 183 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0 | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Facelift 2020 JCW 2.0
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 174 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 AMG GLA 35
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























