Mercedes-Benz GL (X166)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400vsMercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GL (X164)
GL 500
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions225 g/km
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful388 hp289 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Lightest2,170 kg4,784 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t133 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 388hp289kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | 2,850kg6,283lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 112.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.5s Calculated | 43.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 179hp/t133kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 653km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 5,120mm202in | 5,088mm200in |
| Width | 1,934mm76in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,850mm73in | 1,840mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,075mm121in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,675mm66in | 1,648mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 680L | 620L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,300L | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 96L |
| CO2 emissions | 225g/km | 351g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,300 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 6,000 rpm | 2,800-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.5 s | 43.7 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 333 hp 248 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 388 hp 289 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500 has 55 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500: 55 hp (41 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500: 5.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 653 km 406 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.7 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 388 hp 289 kW | 5.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)GL 400 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X164)GL 500 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 388 hp 289 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 653 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 225 g/km | 351 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 179 hp/t 133 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400 | Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 25.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,859 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) GL 400
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 5.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 389 km (241 mi) more estimated range
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
- Emits 126 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz GL (X164) GL 500
- Has 55 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























