Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 450+ 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,703 kg3,754 lb
- Best power-to-weight188 hp/t140 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score86/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
- Most powerful333 hp248 kW
- Highest torque568 Nm419 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 568Nm419lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,703kg3,754lb | 2,405kg5,302lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 2,945kg6,493lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 90.1s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 83.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 36.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 857km533mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,838mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,579mm62in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 36.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | 320 hp 239 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 333 hp 248 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 120 kWh has 13 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 120 kWh: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 2,405 kg 5,302 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | 4.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 6.2 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 120 kWh has more power, Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 120 kWh: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | 320 hp 239 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 2020R 2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 450+ 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 568 Nm 419 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,703 kg 3,754 lb | 2,405 kg 5,302 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 857 km 533 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 R 2.0 TSI
- Is 702 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 450+ 120 kWh
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 148 Nm more
- Has 47 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























