Skoda Superb IV
Car comparison
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2026 EQS 400 112 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2026
EQS 400 112 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 400 112 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque505 Nm372 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score62/100
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Lightest1,702 kg3,752 lb
- Largest trunk645 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 505Nm372lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,702kg3,752lb | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 3,120kg6,878lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 126.2s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 85.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.2s Calculated | 36.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 891km554mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,912mm193in | 5,225mm206in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,496mm59in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 645L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,795L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.2 s | 36.6 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | 367 hp 274 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 400 112 kWh has 163 hp more than Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 400 112 kWh: 163 hp (122 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 1,702 kg 3,752 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | 2,550 kg 5,622 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 400 112 kWh and Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.4 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | 367 hp 274 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 400 112 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,702 kg 3,752 lb | 2,550 kg 5,622 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 891 km 554 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 645 L 22.8 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
- Is 848 kg lighter
- Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2026 EQS 400 112 kWh
- Has 163 hp more
- Has 185 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























