Car comparison

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb IV

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2025-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)

EQS 350 100 kWh

292 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    292 hp
    218 kW
  • Highest torque
    565 Nm
    417 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    248 km/h
    154 mph
  • Lightest
    1,702 kg
    3,752 lb
  • Largest trunk
    645 L
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
204hp152kW
292hp218kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
565Nm417lb-ft
Curb weight
1,702kg3,752lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,910kg6,415lb
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
126.2s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
33.2s
Calculated
39.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
891km554mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
-
Length
4,912mm193in
5,216mm205in
Width
1,849mm73in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,496mm59in
1,512mm60in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
3,210mm126in
Front track
1,580mm62in
1,667mm66in
Rear track
1,568mm62in
1,682mm66in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
134mm5in
Trunk volume
645L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,795L
1,770L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.2 s
39.4 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 88 hp more than Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 88 hp (66 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
565 Nm
417 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
1,702 kg
3,752 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
248 km/h
154 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.4 s
248 km/h
154 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IV2.0 TSIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
204 hp
152 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
565 Nm
417 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
6.6 s
Top speed
248 km/h
154 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,702 kg
3,752 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
645 L
22.8 cu ft
Length
4,912 mm
193.4 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in
Range score
891 km
554 mi
-
Trunk score
645 L
22.8 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI

  • Is 613 kg lighter
  • Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 35 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

  • Has 88 hp more
  • Has 245 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb IV 2.0 TSI vs Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster