Skoda Octavia IV · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia IV · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,583 kg3,490 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,583kg3,490lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 93.2s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.2s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 775km481mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,698mm185in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 600L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,555L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.2 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 88 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 88 hp (66 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has more power, Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 775 km 481 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Is 732 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 88 hp more
- Has 245 Nm more
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























