Skoda Octavia IV
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia IV 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 350 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Highest torque565 Nm417 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Skoda Octavia IV 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Lightest1,548 kg3,413 lb
- Best economy score97/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 565Nm417lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,548kg3,413lb | 2,315kg5,104lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 133.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.2s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.3L/100 km71.3mpg US85.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,351km840mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | - |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,686mm106in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 600L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,555L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.2 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 142 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 142 hp (106 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | 1,548 kg 3,413 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Skoda Octavia IV 2.0 TDI: 2.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IV2.0 TDI | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 565 Nm 417 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,548 kg 3,413 lb | 2,315 kg 5,104 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,351 km 840 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia IV 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 555 L147 US gal122 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 971.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia IV 2.0 TDI
- Is 767 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
- Has 142 hp more
- Has 205 Nm more
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























