Xiaomi SU7
73.6 kWh
299 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSedan2023-2026
Car comparison
Xiaomi SU7 73.6 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
EQE 350 98 kWh
292 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2023-2025
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Xiaomi SU7 73.6 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful299 hp223 kW
- Lightest1,980 kg4,365 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk517 L
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh
- Highest torque765 Nm564 lb-ft
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score65/100
Specification comparison
| Model | XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 292hp218kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 765Nm564lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,435kg5,368lb |
| Gross weight | 2,430kg5,357lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 54.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 25.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,997mm197in | 4,946mm195in |
| Width | 1,963mm77in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,455mm57in | 1,510mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 3,120mm123in |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,699mm67in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 517L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 25.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | 299 hp 223 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW |
Xiaomi SU7 73.6 kWh has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh and Xiaomi SU7 73.6 kWh: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 765 Nm 564 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 2,435 kg 5,368 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | 5.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Xiaomi SU7 73.6 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | 299 hp 223 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | 292 hp 218 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU773.6 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XiaomiSU773.6 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 292 hp 218 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 765 Nm 564 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb | 2,435 kg 5,368 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 517 L 18.3 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Xiaomi SU7 73.6 kWh
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 455 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh
- Has 365 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Xiaomi SU7 73.6 kWh
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) EQE 350 98 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
XiaomiSU773.6 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350+ 105 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)S 450e
XiaomiSU773.6 kWhvsTeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Long Range 79 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 300
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 300d
XiaomiSU773.6 kWhvsBMW5 Series Sedan (G60)540d
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 350d
XiaomiSU773.6 kWhvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 400e
XiaomiSU773.6 kWhvsBMW7 Series (G70)740d
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzA-class Sedan (V177)Facelift 2022AMG A 35
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)EQE 350 98 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W222)Facelift 2017S 350d