Xiaomi SU7
Max 101 kWh
673 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2023-2026
Car comparison
Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
687 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2022-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph
- Lightest2,205 kg4,861 lb
- Best power-to-weight305 hp/t228 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk517 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Most powerful687 hp512 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 673hp502kW | 687hp512kW |
| Torque | 838Nm618lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,655kg5,853lb | - |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 27.2s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s | 9.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.8s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 305hp/t228kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 380Nm/t254lb-ft/ton Calculated | 408Nm/t273lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,997mm197in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,963mm77in | 1,906mm75in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,492mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | - |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,699mm67in | - |
| Trunk volume | 517L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 9.6 s |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.0 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 201 km/h 125 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | 673 hp 502 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh has 14 hp more than Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | 838 Nm 618 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | 2.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh has more power, Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | 305 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | 673 hp 502 kW | 2.8 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 673 hp 502 kW | 687 hp 512 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 838 Nm 618 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,205 kg 4,861 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 517 L 18.3 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 305 hp/t 228 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh
- Is 245 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 162 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Xiaomi SU7 Max 101 kWh
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 S V8
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020Competition 4.4 V8
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)S 580 V8
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 580 V8
XiaomiSU7Max 101 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8