Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,205 km749 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score92/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,500 kg3,307 lb
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Gross weight | 2,215kg4,883lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.5s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 69.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 735km457mi Calculated | 1,205km749mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 153g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 8.1 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 735 km 457 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 1,205 km 749 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 735 km 457 mi | 1,205 km 749 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 153 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 160 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 470 km (292 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























