Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 AMG E 53vsTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020 Long Range 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3 · Facelift 2020
Long Range 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight232 hp/t173 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score83/100
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Long Range 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Most powerful441 hp329 kW
- Largest trunk649 L
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 435hp324kW | 441hp329kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 493Nm364lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,928kg4,251lb |
| Gross weight | 2,495kg5,501lb | 2,301kg5,073lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 42.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 33.8s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,999cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,940mm194in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 649L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 200g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.2 s | 14.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 435 hp 324 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | 441 hp 329 kW |
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Long Range 80.5 kWh has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53 and Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Long Range 80.5 kWh: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | 493 Nm 364 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 4.5 s |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Long Range 80.5 kWh and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | 435 hp 324 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | 441 hp 329 kW | 4.4 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 53 | TeslaModel 3Facelift 2020Long Range 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 435 hp 324 kW | 441 hp 329 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 493 Nm 364 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,928 kg 4,251 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 200 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 649 L 22.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 AMG E 53
- Has 27 Nm more
- Is 53 kg lighter
- Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model 3 Facelift 2020 Long Range 80.5 kWh
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 109 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























