Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 200vsToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 2.5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013

E 200

184 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2016
VS

Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014

2.5

181 hp2494 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    233 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    908 km
    564 mi
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
184hp137kW
181hp135kW
Torque
270Nm199lb-ft
231Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,180kg4,806lb
2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.4s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
78.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.2s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
30.3s
Calculated
36.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
908km564mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
2,494cc152cu in
Length
4,879mm192in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,854mm73in
1,825mm72in
Height
1,474mm58in
1,480mm58in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,598mm63in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,614mm64in
1,565mm62in
Trunk volume
540L
506L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
59L
70L
CO2 emissions-
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 2005,500 rpm1,200-4,600 rpm5,750 rpm
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.56,000 rpm4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.2 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.3 s
36.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
3.0 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
11.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
94 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 has 3 hp more than Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
231 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
233 km/h
145 mph
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
184 hp
137 kW
8.2 s
233 km/h
145 mph
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
181 hp
135 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.2 s
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
184 hp
137 kW
181 hp
135 kW
Torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
231 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.2 s
9.0 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,879 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,474 mm
58.0 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Range score
908 km
564 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
-
183 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 E 200

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 39 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 34 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5

  • Is 75 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) E 200
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 2.5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 E 200 vs Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 2.5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster