Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 S V8vsMercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQE (V295)
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 S V8
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,865 kg4,112 lb
- Best power-to-weight314 hp/t234 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Most powerful687 hp512 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 585hp436kW | 687hp512kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,865kg4,112lb | 2,450kg5,401lb |
| Gross weight | 2,425kg5,346lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 30.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 27.2s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.0s Calculated | 9.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 314hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton Calculated | 408Nm/t273lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 641km398mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,461cc333cu in | - |
| Length | 4,892mm193in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,873mm74in | 1,906mm75in |
| Height | 1,466mm58in | 1,492mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.0 s | 9.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | 585 hp 436 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh has 102 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 S V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 S V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh: 102 hp (76 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | 3.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 3.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 S V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | 585 hp 436 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | 687 hp 512 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 S V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 585 hp 436 kW | 687 hp 512 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,865 kg 4,112 lb | 2,450 kg 5,401 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 641 km 398 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 314 hp/t 234 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 S V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 S V8
- Is 585 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 110 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz EQE (V295) AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
- Has 102 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























