Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) · Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W210) · Facelift 1999
AMG E 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range868 km540 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque530 Nm391 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight207 hp/t154 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 333hp248kW | 354hp264kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 16.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.9s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 17.8L/100 km13.2mpg US15.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t150kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 868km540mi Calculated | 579km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,703mm185in | 4,818mm190in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,397mm55in | 1,411mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,833mm112in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.9 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 16.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 333 hp 248 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 has 21 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 5.7 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8: 4.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 868 km 540 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 579 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 400 V6 3.0 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W210)Facelift 1999AMG E 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 333 hp 248 kW | 354 hp 264 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 868 km 540 mi | 579 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 150 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 154 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C207) Facelift 2013 E 400 V6 3.0
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 290 km (180 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W210) Facelift 1999 AMG E 55 V8
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























