TVR Tuscan
Car comparison
TVR Tuscan 4.0 i 24V SvsMercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
AMG CLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
TVR Tuscan 4.0 i 24V S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful396 hp295 kW
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight360 hp/t268 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score82/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption18.2 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk276 L
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 396hp295kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,100kg2,425lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.0s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.5s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 360hp/t268kW/t163hp/1000 lb Calculated | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 382Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,235mm167in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,200mm47in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,360mm93in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,445mm57in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,474mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 276L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Tuscan 4.0 i 24V S: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 7,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.5 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 396 hp 295 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
TVR Tuscan 4.0 i 24V S has 29 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 and TVR Tuscan 4.0 i 24V S: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 3.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between TVR Tuscan 4.0 i 24V S and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: 1.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 360 hp/t 268 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | 396 hp 295 kW | 3.9 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRTuscan4.0 i 24V S | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 396 hp 295 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 360 hp/t 268 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Tuscan 4.0 i 24V S
- Has 29 hp more
- Is 645 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 54 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Has 150 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 90 Nm more
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























