TVR Chimaera
Car comparison
TVR Chimaera 5.0vsMercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
AMG CLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
TVR Chimaera 5.0
- Fastest top speed271 km/h168 mph
- Lightest1,060 kg2,337 lb
- Best power-to-weight321 hp/t239 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best performance score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TVRChimaera5.0 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 481Nm355lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,060kg2,337lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.7s99% target: 268 km/h / 167 mph Calculated | 70.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 321hp/t239kW/t145hp/1000 lb Calculated | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 454Nm/t304lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,997cc305cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 3,965mm156in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,730mm68in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,223mm48in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,282mm90in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,460mm57in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,474mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 276L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- TVR Chimaera 5.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 5,250 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TVRChimaera5.0 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 has 27 hp more than TVR Chimaera 5.0.
The biggest power difference is between TVR Chimaera 5.0 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 and TVR Chimaera 5.0: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.5 s | 271 km/h 168 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TVRChimaera5.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TVRChimaera5.0 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 481 Nm 355 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 271 km/h 168 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,060 kg 2,337 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 321 hp/t 239 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
TVR Chimaera 5.0
- Is 685 kg lighter
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 110 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 34 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 29 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























