Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8vsPanoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPanoz Esperante
4.6 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight223 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 324hp242kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 427Nm315lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.1s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t167kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 504km313mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 4,601cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,638mm183in | 4,475mm176in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,355mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,715mm107in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,474mm58in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 276L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 390L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.1 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 324 hp 242 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 has 43 hp more than Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 5.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 has more power, Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 223 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | 324 hp 242 kW | 5.1 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 324 hp 242 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 427 Nm 315 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 504 km 313 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 83 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























