Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8vsPanoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999

AMG CLK 55 V8

347 hp5439 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2002
VS

Panoz Esperante

4.6 i V8 32V

324 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1999-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    347 hp
    259 kW
  • Highest torque
    510 Nm
    376 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.1 s
  • Lightest
    1,450 kg
    3,197 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    223 hp/t
    167 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
Power
347hp259kW
324hp242kW
Torque
510Nm376lb-ft
427Nm315lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,450kg3,197lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
249 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
61.9s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
5.1s
0-200 km/h
21.8s
Calculated
18.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
4.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
207hp/t154kW/t94hp/1000 lb
Calculated
223hp/t167kW/t101hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
530km329mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
5,439cc332cu in
4,601cc281cu in
Length
4,567mm180in
4,475mm176in
Width
1,722mm68in
1,860mm73in
Height
1,380mm54in
1,355mm53in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,715mm107in
Front track
1,505mm59in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,488mm59in
1,580mm62in
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
62L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
  • Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V85,500 rpm3,000-4,300 rpm5,750 rpm
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V6,000 rpm4,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
4.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
5.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.8 s
18.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
249 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
173 km/h
108 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
324 hp
242 kW

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has 23 hp more than Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 23 hp (17 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
427 Nm
315 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
1,450 kg
3,197 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
249 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 has more power, Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8: 1.1 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
223 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
347 hp
259 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
324 hp
242 kW
5.1 s
249 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in
PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
Power
324 hp
242 kW
0-100 km/h5.1 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,355 mm
53.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzCLK (A208)Facelift 1999AMG CLK 55 V8PanozEsperante4.6 i V8 32V
Power
347 hp
259 kW
324 hp
242 kW
Torque
510 Nm
376 lb-ft
427 Nm
315 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
5.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
249 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
Fuel consumption
11.7 L/100 km
20.1 mpg US
24.1 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,567 mm
179.8 in
Height
1,380 mm
54.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,355 mm
53.3 in
Range score
530 km
329 mi
-
Power-to-weight score
207 hp/t
154 kW/t
4.8 kg/hp
223 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz CLK (A208) Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8
Consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.47 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.95 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,071 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V

  • Is 230 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) AMG CLK 55 V8
Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz CLK (A208) · Facelift 1999 AMG CLK 55 V8 vs Panoz Esperante 4.6 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster