Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180vsMercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016 SLC 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016
SLC 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score90/100
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Largest trunk420 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,715kg3,781lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 112.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 93.4s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.2s Calculated | 40.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 146Nm/t98lb-ft/ton Calculated | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | 984km611mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 4,133mm163in |
| Width | 1,861mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,423mm56in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,616mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 108mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.2 s | 40.2 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 87 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 and Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 8.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 and Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 and Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 930 km 578 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 984 km 611 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.1 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLE Coupe (C236)CLE 180 | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | 984 km 611 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180 | Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLE Coupe (C236) CLE 180
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 195 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 180
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























