Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220vsVolvo V90 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range1,122 km697 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,440kg3,175lb | 1,906kg4,202lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | - |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 83.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 672km417mi Calculated | 1,122km697mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 104mm4in | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,370L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 146g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | - | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,906 kg 4,202 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220 and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 672 km 417 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,122 km 697 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.1 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220 | VolvoV902.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | 1,906 kg 4,202 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 672 km 417 mi | 1,122 km 697 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 146 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220 | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 220
- Is 466 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 451 km (280 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























