Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200dvsSkoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Combi
iV 1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,489 kg3,283 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t75 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk495 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Skoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption1.2 L/100 km201.0 mpg US241.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range3,376 km2,098 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,489kg3,283lb | 1,545kg3,406lb |
| Gross weight | 2,094kg4,616lb | 2,058kg4,537lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 1.2L/100 km201mpg US241.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 162Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 843km524mi Calculated | 3,376km2,098mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,689mm185in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,535mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 495L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,360L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,550-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 1,489 kg 3,283 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 8.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI and Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 1.2 L/100 km 201.0 mpg US 241.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI and Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 843 km 524 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 3,376 km 2,098 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 7.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI |
| 1.2 L/100 km 201.0 mpg US 241.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 1.2 L/100 km 201.0 mpg US 241.4 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 1.2 L/100 km 201.0 mpg US 241.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | SkodaOctavia IV CombiiV 1.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,489 kg 3,283 lb | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 1.2 L/100 km 201.0 mpg US 241.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 843 km 524 mi | 3,376 km 2,098 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d | Skoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 1.2 L/100 km201 mpg US241.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 2.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 3.30 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 176 L46 US gal39 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 307.13 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Skoda Octavia IV Combi iV 1.4 TSI
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2,533 km (1,574 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























