Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180vsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper D 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions112 g/km
- Best estimated range1,116 km694 mi
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score95/100
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136hp101kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 200Nm148lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,440kg3,175lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 77.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.4s Calculated | 46.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.7s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.7s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 139Nm/t93lb-ft/ton Calculated | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km461mi Calculated | 1,116km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,612mm63in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,370L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 132g/km | 112g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 5,500 rpm | 1,460-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.2 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.4 s | 46.1 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 11.0 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.1 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.7 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 136 hp 101 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180 and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 9.2 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 741 km 461 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,116 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 136 hp 101 kW | 9.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 180 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper D 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp 101 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 200 Nm 148 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.2 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 461 mi | 1,116 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 132 g/km | 112 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180 | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 180
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper D 2.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 375 km (233 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























