Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 · Stage 3vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 · Stage 2vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 · Stage 1vsMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010
AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010
AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010
AMG CL 65 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed411 km/h255 mph
- Most powerful945 hp705 kW
- Highest torque1,550 Nm1,143 lb-ft
- Lightest2,170 kg4,784 lb
- Best power-to-weight435 hp/t325 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption21.8 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 945hp705kW+315 hp | 819hp611kW+189 hp | 743hp554kW+113 hp | 630hp470kW |
| Torque | 1,550Nm1,143lb-ft+550 Nm | 1,350Nm996lb-ft+350 Nm | 1,220Nm900lb-ft+220 Nm | 1,000Nm738lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Gross weight | 2,645kg5,831lb | 2,645kg5,831lb | 2,645kg5,831lb | 2,645kg5,831lb |
| Top speed | 411 km/h 255 mph | 391 km/h 243 mph | 378 km/h 235 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.0s99% target: 407 km/h / 253 mph+6.6 s Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 387 km/h / 241 mph+14.5 s Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 374 km/h / 233 mph+19.7 s Calculated | 56.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s-1.0 s | 3.7s-0.7 s | 4.0s-0.4 s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.4s-6.4 s Calculated | 9.7s-5.2 s Calculated | 10.6s-4.3 s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s-0.9 s Calculated | 3.6s-0.6 s Calculated | 3.8s-0.4 s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s-1.8 s Calculated | 11.2s-1.2 s Calculated | 11.6s-0.9 s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 435hp/t325kW/t198hp/1000 lb Calculated | 377hp/t281kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated | 343hp/t255kW/t155hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 714Nm/t478lb-ft/ton Calculated | 622Nm/t416lb-ft/ton Calculated | 562Nm/t376lb-ft/ton Calculated | 461Nm/t308lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,980cc365cu in | 5,980cc365cu in | 5,980cc365cu in | 5,980cc365cu in |
| Length | 5,106mm201in | 5,106mm201in | 5,106mm201in | 5,106mm201in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,871mm74in | 1,871mm74in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,428mm56in | 1,428mm56in | 1,428mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,955mm116in | 2,955mm116in | 2,955mm116in | 2,955mm116in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,601mm63in | 1,601mm63in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,607mm63in | 1,607mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | 133mm5in | 133mm5in | 133mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 490L | 490L | 490L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 90L | 90L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2) 819 hp: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1) 743 hp: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 630 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 4,600-5,000 rpm | 2,300-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 4,600-5,000 rpm | 2,300-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 4,600-5,000 rpm | 2,300-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 4,600-5,000 rpm | 2,300-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.6 s | 3.8 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.4 s | 9.7 s | 10.6 s | 14.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 20.0 s | 24.9 s | 29.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 411 km/h 255 mph | 391 km/h 243 mph | 378 km/h 235 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.1 s | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | 7.8 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 9.6 s | 9.9 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 11.2 s | 11.6 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 233 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 945 hp 705 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 819 hp 611 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 743 hp 554 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 630 hp 470 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp has 315 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 630 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 630 hp and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp: 315 hp (235 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 1,550 Nm 1,143 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 1,350 Nm 996 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 1,220 Nm 900 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 411 km/h 255 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 391 km/h 243 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 378 km/h 235 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 630 hp: 1.0 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2) 819 hp and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1) 743 hp, separated by only 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 435 hp/t 325 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 377 hp/t 281 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 343 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 629 km 391 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 629 km 391 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 629 km 391 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 945 hp 705 kW | 3.4 s | 411 km/h 255 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 819 hp 611 kW | 3.7 s | 391 km/h 243 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 743 hp 554 kW | 4.0 s | 378 km/h 235 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 630 hp 470 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | 435 hp/t 325 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | 377 hp/t 281 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | 343 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3)945 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2)819 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1)743 hp | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12630 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 945 hp 705 kW | 819 hp 611 kW | 743 hp 554 kW | 630 hp 470 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,550 Nm 1,143 lb-ft | 1,350 Nm 996 lb-ft | 1,220 Nm 900 lb-ft | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.7 s | 4.0 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 411 km/h 255 mph | 391 km/h 243 mph | 378 km/h 235 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | 629 km 391 mi | 629 km 391 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 435 hp/t 325 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 377 hp/t 281 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 343 hp/t 255 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2) 819 hp | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 1) 743 hp | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 630 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 3) 945 hp
- Has 126 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 58 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 (Stage 2) 819 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























