Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) · Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C215)
AMG CL 63 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful630 hp470 kW
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight290 hp/t216 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.8 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score55/100
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12
- Lightest1,880 kg4,145 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630hp470kW | 444hp331kW |
| Torque | 1,000Nm738lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | 2,645kg5,831lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 290hp/t216kW/t132hp/1000 lb Calculated | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 461Nm/t308lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 629km391mi Calculated | 624km388mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,980cc365cu in | 6,258cc382cu in |
| Length | 5,106mm201in | 4,993mm197in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,428mm56in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,955mm116in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,578mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 133mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 4,600-5,000 rpm | 2,300-4,300 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 5,500 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 630 hp 470 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 444 hp 331 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 has 186 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12: 186 hp (139 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 629 km 391 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 624 km 388 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 630 hp 470 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 444 hp 331 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzCL (C216)Facelift 2010AMG CL 65 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp 470 kW | 444 hp 331 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 629 km 391 mi | 624 km 388 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.03 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,754 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz CL (C216) Facelift 2010 AMG CL 65 V12
- Has 186 hp more
- Has 380 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12
- Is 290 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























