Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 300vsTesla Model 3 Highland · Facelift 2023 Standard 62.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3 Highland · Facelift 2023
Standard 62.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 300
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score88/100
Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 Standard 62.5 kWh
- Most powerful283 hp211 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk594 L
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 283hp211kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,772kg3,907lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 2,149kg4,738lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 45.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 943km586mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,720mm186in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 594L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 165 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | 283 hp 211 kW |
Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 Standard 62.5 kWh has 25 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 300 and Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 Standard 62.5 kWh: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | 1,772 kg 3,907 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | 6.1 s |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | 6.1 s |
Although Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 Standard 62.5 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | 283 hp 211 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 300 | TeslaModel 3 HighlandFacelift 2023Standard 62.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 283 hp 211 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 201 km/h125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,772 kg 3,907 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 943 km 586 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 594 L 21.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 300 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 300
- Is 87 kg lighter
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model 3 Highland Facelift 2023 Standard 62.5 kWh
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 139 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























