Renault Talisman · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Renault Talisman · Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCivsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 220d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score94/100
Renault Talisman Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk608 L
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Gross weight | 2,197kg4,844lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.3s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km487mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,848mm191in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,463mm58in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,808mm111in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 608L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Talisman Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.3 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Renault Talisman Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Renault Talisman Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 783 km 487 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultTalismanFacelift 20202.0 Blue dCi | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 487 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 608 L 21.5 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Talisman Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Talisman Facelift 2020 2.0 Blue dCi
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 153 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 50 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























