Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 250vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful218 hp163 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range917 km570 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
- Lightest1,630 kg3,594 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218hp163kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 24.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 917km570mi Calculated | 725km450mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,613mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 5,000-6,100 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 24.3 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 7.1 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 917 km 570 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 725 km 450 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 218 hp 163 kW | 7.1 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp 163 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 917 km 570 mi | 725 km 450 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























